Judgment Header
Public Prosecutor v Rosman bin Anwar and another appeal [2015] SGHC 247
[2015] SGHC 247
General Division of the High Court of Singapore25 Sept 2015Magistrate's Appeals Nos 9069 and 9070 of 2015
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 2 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“case precedent which supports the proposition that all background facts can be considered in assessing the credibility of the witnesses, including the accused and the victim. In PP v Rosman bin Anwar [2015] SGHC 247, the accused persons (who were husband and wife) were convicted on charges of voluntarily causing hurt t”
“the consideration of background facts in assessing credibility should depend on whether those facts could constitute separate offences: HC GD at [26]. The case of Public Prosecutor v Rosman bin Anwar [2015] SGHC 247 (“Rosman bin Anwar”) supported the proposition that all background facts could be considered in assessin”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Public Prosecutor v Rosman bin Anwar and another appeal [2015] SGHC 247
Case Metadata
Case No: Magistrate's Appeals Nos 9069 and 9070 of 2015
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2015-09-25
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.