Judgment Header
Public Prosecutor v Project Lifestyle Pte Ltd [2015] SGHC 251
Loading…
[2015] SGHC 251
General Division of the High Court of Singapore25 Sept 2015Magistrate's Appeal No 83 of 2015
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 1 later decision. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“For completeness, I agree with the District Judge that the Bifurcated Approach was not applied by the High Court in Public Prosecutor v Project Lifestyle Pte Ltd [2015] SGHC 251 (“Project Lifestyle”), a case which was concerned with s 12(2) of the Planning Act. Nor was it applied in two unreported decisions of the Dist”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Public Prosecutor v Project Lifestyle Pte Ltd [2015] SGHC 251
Case Metadata
Case No: Magistrate's Appeal No 83 of 2015
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2015-09-25
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.