Judgment Header
Kao Chai-Chau Linda v Fong Wai Lyn Carolyn and others [2015] SGHC 260
Court DecisionSGHC
[2015] SGHC 260
[2015] SGHC 260
General Division of the High Court of Singapore14 Oct 2015Summons No 4976 of 2014 in Suit No 428 of 2010
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
This decision has been distinguished in a later judgment and cited in 2 other later decisions. Confirm it is still good law before relying on it.
- Distinguished by 1. ) SIMON NG SAI HOONG v 1. ) LIM KENG PEO (Pelikuidasi Untuk Mammoth Empire Land Sdn Bhd) (WA-24NCvC-2248-06/2024)
Detected automatically from later judgments; not a substitute for a citator check.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
3Later cases and laws citing this decision
- Distinguished1. ) SIMON NG SAI HOONG v 1. ) LIM KENG PEO (Pelikuidasi Untuk Mammoth Empire Land Sdn Bhd) (WA-24NCvC-2248-06/2024)Case
“Court the basis of the sum. Although the time cost table seemed particularise, there is no entry for the verification charges. The Singaporean case of Kao Chai-Chau Linda v Ong Wai Lyn Carolyn & Ors [2015] SGHC 260; [2016] 1 SLR 2 is distinguished.”
“[2015] SGHC 260 [2016] 1 SLR 2; Ong Kong Yew and Others v Ong Ching Chee [2018] 1 LNS 2247. 20 36. Sf; Res Judicata Before proceeding further, | would first deal with the predominant issue of res judicata. Lear”
- CitedAdam Primus Varghese Bin Abdullah v KHEE SAN FOOD INDUSTRIES SDN. BHD. (WA-24NCC-455-09/2024)Case
“stitute inappropriate overlap, particularly given the complexity and scope of duties required in managing the Defendant's operations. The case of Kao Chai-Chau Linda v Fong Wai Lyn Carolyn and others [2015] SGHC 260, decided by the Singapore High Court, establishes that a court can subtract claims for billable hours wh”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Summons No 4976 of 2014 in Suit No 428 of 2010
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2015-10-14
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.