Judgment Header
Attorney-General v Lai Swee Lin Linda [2015] SGHC 269
Loading…
[2015] SGHC 269
General Division of the High Court of Singapore19 Oct 2015Originating Summons No 1014 of 2014
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 2 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“28. In Attorney-General v Lai Swee Lin Linda [2015] SGHC 269, the Singapore High Court, interpreting a provision in pari materia with Paragraph 17 of the Schedule to the CJA 1964, held: "[24] The mere institution of vexatious proceedings does not itself bring”
“tral inquiry in all such cases is whether the award reflects the fact that the arbitral tribunal had applied its mind to the critical issues and arguments. It further refers to a passage in AQU v AQV [2015] SGHC 269 where it was said that “courts should not undertake a review of the substantive merits of the underlying”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Attorney-General v Lai Swee Lin Linda [2015] SGHC 269
Case Metadata
Case No: Originating Summons No 1014 of 2014
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2015-10-19
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.