Judgment Header
Public Prosecutor v Masoud Rahimi bin Mehrzad and another [2015] SGHC 288
Court DecisionSGHC
[2015] SGHC 288
[2015] SGHC 288
General Division of the High Court of Singapore4 Nov 2015Criminal Case No 14 of 2013
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 3 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
3Later cases and laws citing this decision
“impose a term of imprisonment in lieu of caning. In support of its position, the Defence cited the cases of PP v Lim Bee Hoon and another [2015] SGHC 45 and PP v Masoud Rahimi bin Mehrzad and another [2015] SGHC 288. In these cases, the minimum imprisonment term of 20 years was imposed for the principal offence of traf”
“These two appeals were against the decision of the trial judge in Public Prosecutor v Masoud Rahimi bin Mehrzad and another [2015] SGHC 288 (“the HC Judgment”) which involved a joint trial of two persons, Masoud Rahimi bin Mehrzad (“Masoud”) and Mogan Raj Terapadisamy (“Mogan”). We dismissed both appeals at the conclus”
“s 33B(2)(a) of the MDA and was not issued with a certificate of substantive assistance by the Public Prosecutor pursuant to s 33B(2)(b): see Public Prosecutor v Masoud Rahimi bin Mehrzad and another [2015] SGHC 288 at [26]. Mr Mogan was sentenced to the mandatory minimum of 20 years’ imprisonment and 15 strokes of the”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Criminal Case No 14 of 2013
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2015-11-04
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.