Judgment Header
City Harvest Church v AMAC Capital Partners and another [2015] SGHC 299
Court DecisionSGHC
[2015] SGHC 299
[2015] SGHC 299
General Division of the High Court of Singapore17 Nov 2015Suit No 1077 of 2014 (Registrar's Appeal Nos 181 and 182 of 2015)
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 1 later decision. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
1Later cases and laws citing this decision
“nd are settled. These principles remain relevant when considering whether an order setting aside a default judgment should be made conditional (City Harvest Church v AMAC Capital Partners and another [2015] SGHC 299 at [30]). A condition is appropriate when the court has the sense that although it cannot be said that t”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit No 1077 of 2014 (Registrar's Appeal Nos 181 and 182 of 2015)
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2015-11-17
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.