Judgment Header
Tan Chin Hoon and others v Tan Choo Suan (in her personal capacity and as executrix of the estate of Tan Kiam Toen, deceased) and others and other matters [2015] SGHC 306
Court DecisionSGHC
[2015] SGHC 306
[2015] SGHC 306
General Division of the High Court of Singapore27 Nov 2015Suit No 570 of 2010, Suit No 170 of 2011 and Originating Summons No 921 of 2012
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 9 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
9Later cases and laws citing this decision
“ion of the High Court judge (“the Judge”) in Tan Chin Hoon and others v Tan Choo Suan (in her personal capacity and as executrix of the estate of Tan Kiam Toen, deceased) and others and other matters [2015] SGHC 306 (which was reported in part in [2016] 1 SLR 1150) (“the GD”). These appeals – wherein sibling is pitted”
“and another (1881) 6 App Cas 251 (“Mackay”), Tan Chin Hoon and others v Tan Choo Suan (in her personal capacity and as executrix of the estate of Tan Kiam Toen, deceased) and others and other matters [2015] SGHC 306 (“Tan Chin Hoon”) at [138] and Evergreat Construction Co Pte Ltd v Presscrete Engineering Pte Ltd [2006]”
“[50], cited by the High Court in the case of Tan Chin Hoon and others v Tan Choo Suan (in her personal capacity and as executrix of the estate of Tan Kiam Toen, deceased) and others and other matters [2015] SGHC 306 (at [141]–[143]) which the 2nd defendant referred to in cross-examination). Furthermore, as the 2nd defe”
“Ltd (in liquidation) [2001] 2 SLR(R) 246 and Tan Chin Hoon and others v Tan Choo Suan (in her personal capacity and as executrix of the estate of Tan Kiam Toen, deceased) and others and other matters [2015] SGHC 306. I accordingly recalled my earlier judgment and heard the further arguments.”
“nsiderations. In contrast, Coomaraswamy J in Tan Chin Hoon and others v Tan Choo Suan (in her personal capacity and as executrix of the estate of Tan Kiam Teon, deceased) and others and other matters [2015] SGHC 306 (“Tan Chin Hoon”) seemed to consider it as a term to be implied in fact, as he analysed whether it was n”
Show 4 moreShow fewer
“r arguments after a trial. The first case is Tan Chin Hoon and others v Tan Choo Suan (in her personal capacity and as executrix of the estate of Tan Kiam Toen, deceased) and others and other matters [2015] SGHC 306. There, after delivering the judgment but upon hearing further arguments from the plaintiff, the court e”
“nd who is no longer dependent on the parent (Tan Chin Hoon and others v Tan Choo Suan (in her personal capacity and as executrix of the estate of Tan Kiam Toen, deceased) and others and other matters [2015] SGHC 306 at [235]). The Court of Appeal considered this question briefly in Lau Siew Kim (at [68]). The considera”
“rom the date the Property was purchased: see Tan Chin Hoon and others v Tan Choo Suan (in her personal capacity and as executrix of the estate of Tan Kiam Toen, deceased) and others and other matters [2015] SGHC 306 (“Tan Chin Hoon”) at [216].”
“were considered by Vinodh Coomaraswamy J in Tan Chin Hoon and others v Tan Choo Suan (in her personal capacity and as executrix of the estate of Tan Kiam Toen (deceased) and others and other matters [2015] SGHC 306, where he aptly pointed out (at [195]) as follows:”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit No 570 of 2010, Suit No 170 of 2011 and Originating Summons No 921 of 2012
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2015-11-27
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.