Judgment Header
CAA Technologies Pte Ltd v HP Construction & Engineering Pte Ltd [2015] SGHC 32
Court DecisionSGHC
[2015] SGHC 32
[2015] SGHC 32
General Division of the High Court of Singapore28 Jan 2015Suit No 333 of 2013
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
This decision has been distinguished in a later judgment. Confirm it is still good law before relying on it.
- Distinguished by SYARIKAT MUHIBAH PERNIAGAAN & PEMBINAAN SDN BHD v PROJALMA SDN BHD (WA-22C-29-04/2018)
Detected automatically from later judgments; not a substitute for a citator check.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
1Later cases and laws citing this decision
- DistinguishedSYARIKAT MUHIBAH PERNIAGAAN & PEMBINAAN SDN BHD v PROJALMA SDN BHD (WA-22C-29-04/2018)Case
“the subsistence of the defects and the associated costs of rectification or modification, these backcharges are rejected. The case of CAA Technologies Pte Ltd v HP Construction & Engineering Pte Ltd [2015] SGHC 32 relied by the Plaintiff is distinguishable by reason that it did not concern defect rectification but the”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit No 333 of 2013
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2015-01-28
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.