Judgment Header
D'Rozario Pancratius Joseph v Public Prosecutor [2015] SGHC 46
Loading…
[2015] SGHC 46
General Division of the High Court of Singapore11 Feb 2015Magistrate's Appeal No 65 of 2014
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 2 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“Furthermore, the offence of dangerous driving is one that calls for both specific and general deterrence (D’Rozario Pancratius Joseph v Public Prosecutor [2015] SGHC 46 at [27]). Allowing a court to take into account a compounded offence under the RTA (or its subsidiary legislation) gives better effect to this need. In”
“In dangerous driving offences, the primary sentencing considerations are those of specific and general deterrence: see D’Rozario Pancratius Joseph v Public Prosecutor [2015] SGHC 46 at [27], as recently affirmed in Koh Thiam Huat at [60].”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
D'Rozario Pancratius Joseph v Public Prosecutor [2015] SGHC 46
Case Metadata
Case No: Magistrate's Appeal No 65 of 2014
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2015-02-11
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.