Judgment Header
D'Rozario Pancratius Joseph v Public Prosecutor [2015] SGHC 46
Court DecisionSGHC
[2015] SGHC 46
[2015] SGHC 46
General Division of the High Court of Singapore11 Feb 2015Magistrate's Appeal No 65 of 2014
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 2 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
2Later cases and laws citing this decision
“Furthermore, the offence of dangerous driving is one that calls for both specific and general deterrence (D’Rozario Pancratius Joseph v Public Prosecutor [2015] SGHC 46 at [27]). Allowing a court to take into account a compounded offence under the RTA (or its subsidiary legislation) gives better effect to this need. In”
“In dangerous driving offences, the primary sentencing considerations are those of specific and general deterrence: see D’Rozario Pancratius Joseph v Public Prosecutor [2015] SGHC 46 at [27], as recently affirmed in Koh Thiam Huat at [60].”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Magistrate's Appeal No 65 of 2014
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2015-02-11
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.