Judgment Header
Public Prosecutor v Chong Hou En [2015] SGHC 69
Court DecisionSGHC
[2015] SGHC 69
[2015] SGHC 69
General Division of the High Court of Singapore16 Mar 2015Magistrate's Appeal No 290 of 2013
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 2 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
2Later cases and laws citing this decision
“The Prosecution further pointed out that in PP v Chong Hou En [2015] SGHC 69 (“Chong Hou En”), the High Court accepted that voyeuristic disorders do not deprive a person of self-control in the way an impulse-control disorder does (at [61]). The High Court further noted that i”
“[20] In this Court’s view a more relevant Singapore decision to refer to, unlike in Goh Li Yin which dealt with an accused suffering from kleptomania, would be PP v Chong Hou En [2015] SGHC 69 which dealt with an accused who also suffered from a 10 voyeuristic disorder. In that case the High Court had the benefit of co”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Magistrate's Appeal No 290 of 2013
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2015-03-16
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.