Judgment Header
Shanghai Construction (Group) General Co. Singapore Branch v Tan Poo Seng [2012] SGHCR 10
Loading…
[2012] SGHCR 10
High Court of Singapore27 Jul 2012Suit No 146 of 2012 (Summons No 3323 of 2012)
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 2 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“oup Limited [2014] NZHC 1681 (“Danone”), Reichhold Norway ASA v Goldman Sachs International [2000] 1 WLR 173 (“Reichhold”) and Shanghai Construction (Group) General Co Singapore Branch v Tan Poo Seng [2012] SGHCR 10 (“Shanghai Construction”). In particular, the Defendants highlight that the case of Shanghai Constructio”
“This was similarly recognised in Shanghai Construction (Group) General Co. Singapore Branch v Tan Poo Seng [2012] SGHCR 10 (“Shanghai Construction”). In Shanghai Construction, the plaintiff had entered into a contractual agreement with a construction company, Top Zone Construction & Engineering Pte Ltd (“Top Zone”) for”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Shanghai Construction (Group) General Co. Singapore Branch v Tan Poo Seng [2012] SGHCR 10
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit No 146 of 2012 (Summons No 3323 of 2012)
Case Metadata
Court: High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2012-07-27
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.