Judgment Header
Hayate Investment Co Ltd v ManagementPlus (Singapore) Pte Ltd [2012] SGHCR 3
Court DecisionSGHCR
[2012] SGHCR 3
[2012] SGHCR 3
High Court of Singapore9 May 2012Suit No 929 of 2011(Summons No 222 of 2012)
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 2 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
2Later cases and laws citing this decision
“ch developed independently in the Court of Chancery. The principles relating to and background context of legal set-off are summarised in Hayate Investment Co Ltd v ManagementPlus (Singapore) Pte Ltd [2012] SGHCR 3 (“Hayate”) at [15]–[17] (see also Rory Derham, The Law of Set-Off (Oxford University Press, 4th Ed, 2010)”
“learned author opines that set-off can be defined as the setting of money cross-claims against each other to produce a balance (see also Hayate Investment Co Ltd v ManagementPlus (Singapore) Pte Ltd [2012] SGHCR 3 (“Hayate”) at [11]). No such material facts supporting the setting of monetary cross-claims against each o”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit No 929 of 2011(Summons No 222 of 2012)
Case Metadata
Court: High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2012-05-09
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.