Judgment Header
The "Chem Orchid" [2014] SGHCR 1
Court DecisionSGHCR
[2014] SGHCR 1
[2014] SGHCR 1
High Court of Singapore6 Jan 2014ADM Suit No 184 of 2011(SUM No 999 of 2012), ADM Suit No 197 of 2011(SUM No 1009 of 2012), ADM Suit No 198 of 2011(SUM No 1002 of 2012) and ADM Suit No 201 of 2011(SUM No 1005 of 2012)
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 2 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
2Later cases and laws citing this decision
“In the court below, the assistant registrar (“the AR”) set aside the Creditors’ in rem writs (see The Chem Orchid [2014] SGHCR 1), but the High Court judge (“the Judge”) allowed the Creditors’ appeals and reversed the AR’s decision (see The Chem Orchid [2015] 2 SLR 1020 (“the HC Judgment”)). As four different in rem wr”
“uired for a notice of termination. Words like “terminate” or “termination” need not be used so long as “it is clear that the effect of the notice is to terminate the agreement”: see The “Chem Orchid” [2014] SGHCR 1 at [65]. Moreover, as held in Sintra Merchants Pte Ltd v Brown Noel Trading Pte Ltd (Donald & McArthy Pte”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: ADM Suit No 184 of 2011(SUM No 999 of 2012), ADM Suit No 197 of 2011(SUM No 1009 of 2012), ADM Suit No 198 of 2011(SUM No 1002 of 2012) and ADM Suit No 201 of 2011(SUM No 1005 of 2012)
Case Metadata
Court: High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2014-01-06
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.