Judgment Header
FirstLink Investments Corp Ltd v GT Payment Pte Ltd and others [2014] SGHCR 12
Loading…
[2014] SGHCR 12
High Court of Singapore19 Jun 2014Suit No 915 of 2013 (Summons No 5657 of 2013)
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 3 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“law must, in the absence of an unmistakable intention to the contrary, govern the arbitration agreement. Singapore took a different approach. In FirstLink Investments Corp Ltd v GT Payment Pte Ltd [2014] SGHCR 12, the learned Senior Assistant Registrar held that in the absence of an express choice of the law governing”
“ded to the law of the seat of the arbitration in determining the parties’ implied choice of law. In this regard, the plaintiff relies on FirstLink Investments Corp Ltd v GT Payment Pte Ltd and others [2014] SGHCR 12 (“FirstLink”), which, it claims, represents the law in Singapore.”
“table presumption that the implied choice would be the expressly chosen law of the substantive contract (at [26]). On the other hand, in FirstLink Investments Corp Ltd v GT Payment Pte Ltd and others [2014] SGHCR 12 (“FirstLink”), the Court took the position that in a competition between an expressly chosen substantive”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
FirstLink Investments Corp Ltd v GT Payment Pte Ltd and others [2014] SGHCR 12
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit No 915 of 2013 (Summons No 5657 of 2013)
Case Metadata
Court: High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2014-06-19
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.