Judgment Header
AmFraser Securities Pte Ltd v Goh Chengyu [2014] SGHCR 14
Court DecisionSGHCR
[2014] SGHCR 14
[2014] SGHCR 14
High Court of Singapore29 Jul 2014Suit No 88 of 2014 (Summons No 2025 of 2014)
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 1 later decision. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
1Later cases and laws citing this decision
“erally not make any significant headway in raising triable issues or demonstrating any probability of a bona fide defence at all” (SCP at para 14/4/5, citing AmFraser Securities Pte ltd v Goh Chengyu [2014] SGHCR 14 at [32] and [33]). On the facts before me, I am of the view that Sumatec’s Estoppel defence is indeed ba”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit No 88 of 2014 (Summons No 2025 of 2014)
Case Metadata
Court: High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2014-07-29
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.