Judgment Header
William Jacks & Co (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Nelson Honey & Marketing (NZ) Ltd [2015] SGHCR 21
Loading…
[2015] SGHCR 21
High Court of Singapore16 Sept 2015Suit No 85 of 2015 (Summons No 2064 of 2015)
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 3 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“The issue of whether the approach in ISC Technologies should apply in Singapore was touched on tangentially in the case of William Jacks & Co (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Nelson Honey & Marketing (NZ) Ltd [2015] SGHCR 21 (“William Jacks”). In William Jacks, the plaintiff secured leave to serve a writ on the defendant outside”
“I also note that in an earlier case of William Jacks & Co (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Nelson Honey & Marketing (NZ) Ltd [2015] SGHCR 21 (“William Jacks”), the assistant registrar relied on NML Capital, and held that, in the absence of any finding that the plaintiff’s conduct was an abuse of process, a new cause of action and”
“that foreign court is the appropriate forum, and the appropriateness of other forums, can never give rise to issue estoppel (William Jacks & Co (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Nelson Honey & Marketing (NZ) Ltd [2015] SGHCR 21 at [60]–[62]).”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
William Jacks & Co (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Nelson Honey & Marketing (NZ) Ltd [2015] SGHCR 21
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit No 85 of 2015 (Summons No 2064 of 2015)
Case Metadata
Court: High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2015-09-16
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.