Judgment Header
AYY v AYZ and another [2015] SGHCR 22
Court DecisionSGHCR
[2015] SGHCR 22
[2015] SGHCR 22
High Court of Singapore2 Nov 2015Originating Summons No 695 of 2015 (Summons No 4895 of 2015)
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 1 later decision. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
1Later cases and laws citing this decision
“setting out the appropriate test to be applied for stay of arbitrations under s 10(9)(a) of the IAA. This was acknowledged in the sole authority that has dealt with this point: AYY v AYZ and another [2015] SGHCR 22 (“AYY v AYZ”) at [3]. In AYY v AYZ, the Assistant Registrar sought to “sow some jurisprudential seeds in”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Originating Summons No 695 of 2015 (Summons No 4895 of 2015)
Case Metadata
Court: High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2015-11-02
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.