Suggest a correction

Right to benefit unaffected by notice of dismissal given without sufficient cause

Employment Act 1968

Match the official source exactly.

What needs fixing?

Wrong or mistyped textWrong structure or numberingWrong title or detailsDuplicated content

Proposed text

—(1) Without affecting sections 81 and 84A, a notice of dismissal given without sufficient cause by an employer to a female employee which —(a)if given before 1 May 2013, is given —(i)within a period of 6 months preceding the estimated delivery date for her confinement (as certified by a medical practitioner); or(ii)within a period of 6 months preceding the date of her confinement;(b)if given on or after 1 May 2013, is given at any time of her pregnancy (as certified by a medical practitioner before the notice of dismissal is given), where the female employee has served the employer for a period of 3 months or more immediately preceding the day the notice is given; or(c)if given on or after 1 May 2013 but before 1 August 2013 and where the female employee has served the employer for a period of less than 3 months, is given —(i)within a period of 6 months preceding the estimated delivery date for her confinement (as certified by a medical practitioner); or(ii)within a period of 6 months preceding the date of her confinement,does not have the effect of depriving her of any payment to which, but for that notice, she would have been entitled or would, on or before the date of her confinement, have become entitled to under this Part.(1A) In any case where there are 2 or more estimated delivery dates (each certified by a medical practitioner) for the confinement of a female employee, the estimated delivery date that is relevant for the purposes of subsection (1) is the estimated delivery date —(a)which is certified by a medical practitioner before the notice of dismissal is given by her employer; and(b)the date of such certification of which is closest to the date the notice of dismissal is given.(2) Subject to section 3 of the Employment Claims Act 2016, where a female employee in the circumstances mentioned in subsection (1)(a), (b) or (c) considers that a notice of dismissal given to her was not given for sufficient cause, the female employee may lodge a claim, under section 13 of that Act, for either of the following remedies:(a)reinstatement in her former employment;(b)compensation.(3) If a Tribunal hearing the claim is satisfied that the female employee has been dismissed without sufficient cause, the Tribunal may, despite any rule of law or agreement to the contrary —(a)in a claim for reinstatement of the employee in her former employment, direct the employer —(i)to reinstate the employee in her former employment; and(ii)to pay the employee an amount equivalent to the wages that the employee would have earned, if she had not been dismissed by the employer; or(b)in a claim for compensation, direct the employer to pay, as compensation to the employee, an amount of wages determined by the Tribunal to be just and equitable having regard to all the circumstances of the case.

What's the problem? (required)

Source link (optional)

Describe the problem (and edit the text or pick an issue type) to submit.

Suggestions are submitted anonymously. No account or personal information is required or sent.