Singapore legislation

Section 189

of Securities and Futures Act 2001

Section 189

Power of approved exchange to settle claims

Amended by2/20092/20092/200940/20192/20092/20092/20092/200940/2019

(1)

An approved exchange may, subject to this Part, allow and settle any proper claim for compensation out of a fidelity fund at any time after the commission of the defalcation in respect of which the claim arose.

Amended by2/2009

(2)

Subject to subsection (3), a person must not commence proceedings under this Part against an approved exchange without the consent of the approved exchange, unless —

(a)

the approved exchange has disallowed the person’s claim; and

(b)

the claimant has exhausted all relevant rights of action and other legal remedies for the recovery of the money or other property, in respect of which the defalcation was committed, available against a member of the approved exchange in relation to whom or to which the claim arose and all other persons liable in respect of the loss suffered by the claimant.

Amended by2/2009

(3)

A person who has been refused consent to commence proceedings under this Part by an approved exchange under subsection (2) may apply for leave to a Judge sitting in chambers in the General Division of the High Court who may make such order in the matter as he or she thinks fit.

Amended by2/200940/2019

(4)

An approved exchange must, after disallowing (whether wholly or in part) any claim for compensation out of a fidelity fund, serve notice of the disallowance in the prescribed form on the claimant or the claimant’s solicitor.

Amended by2/2009

(5)

No proceedings against an approved exchange in respect of a claim which has been disallowed by the exchange may be commenced after the expiration of 3 months after service of notice of disallowance under subsection (4).

Amended by2/2009

(6)

In any proceedings brought to establish a claim —

(a)

evidence of any admission or confession by, or other evidence which would be admissible against, the member of an approved exchange or other person by whom it is alleged a defalcation was committed, is admissible to prove the commission of the defalcation, even though the member or other person is not the defendant in or a party to those proceedings; and

(b)

all defences which would have been available to that member or person are available to the approved exchange.

Amended by2/2009

(7)

An approved exchange or, where proceedings are brought to establish a claim, the General Division of the High Court, if satisfied that the defalcation on which the claim is founded was actually committed, may allow the claim and act accordingly, even though the person who committed the defalcation has not been convicted or prosecuted therefor or that the evidence on which the approved exchange or the General Division of the High Court (as the case may be) acts would not be sufficient to establish the guilt of that person upon a criminal trial in respect of the defalcation.

Amended by2/200940/2019