Singapore legislation
Clause 16
Clause 16
Defences to offence of publishing remote gambling service advertisement
(1)
Where a person is charged with an offence under section 15(1), it is a defence for the person charged to prove that the person published a remote gambling service advertisement for or on the direction of an exempt operator.
(2)
Where a person is charged with an offence under section 15(1) for publishing a remote gambling service advertisement, it is a defence for the person charged to prove that —
the remote gambling service advertisement was so published as an accidental or incidental accompaniment to the publication of other matter not forming part of any promotion of remote gambling; and
the person does not receive any direct or indirect benefit (whether financial or not) for publishing that advertisement, in addition to any direct or indirect benefit that the person receives for publishing that other matter.
(3)
Where a person is charged with an offence under section 15(1), it is also a defence for the person charged to prove that —
the person is acting in the course of a business of delivering, transmitting or broadcasting communications (in whatever form or by whatever means) or making data available; and
the nature of the business is such that persons undertaking it have no control over the nature or content of the communications or data.