Singapore legislation

Clause 226

of Courts (Civil and Criminal Justice) Reform Bill

Clause 226

Saving for referential provision

Despite sections 41D(1) and 41E of the Interpretation Act, as from the date of commencement of section 3(1), a reference in any written law to any of the following matters in relation to any proceedings mentioned in section 224(2) is not to be construed as a reference to an expression in the second column of the table in section 41D(1) or 41E of the Interpretation Act, and any such proceedings are to continue in accordance with the provisions of the relevant written law and the practice and procedure as were in force and applicable in relation to those proceedings immediately before that date:

(a)

writ of summons;

(b)

originating summons;

(c)

subpoena;

(d)

writ of execution;

(e)

writ of seizure and sale;

(f)

writ of possession;

(g)

garnishee order;

(h)

memorandum of appearance;

(i)

entry of appearance in relation to a writ of summons;

(j)

leave of court;

(k)

plaintiff;

(l)

ex parte application.

Read in full context — Courts (Civil and Criminal Justice) Reform Bill →