Suggest a correction

Content

Midnight means midnight: Court clarifies that multi-jurisdictional 'Banking Days' do not extend payment deadlines across time zones

Match the official source exactly.

What needs fixing?

Wrong or mistyped textWrong structure or numberingWrong title or detailsDuplicated content

Proposed text

Singapore Client Update                                                                                     JULY 2026

1
© RAJAH & TANN SINGAPORE LLP
SHIPPING & INTERNATIONAL TRADE
Midnight Means Midnight: Court Clarifies
That Multi-Jurisdictional 'Banking Days' Do
Not Extend Payment Deadlines Across Time
Zones

Introduction

In a recent decision of Songa Product and Chemical Tankers IV AS v Gardsea Shipping Inc [2026]
EWHC 1559 (Comm), the English Commercial Court has provided important clarification on the interpretation of "Banking Days" in multi-jurisdictional ship sale contracts.

The Court allowed an appeal under section 69 of the Arbitration Act 1996 from a London Maritime
Arbitrators Association ("LMAA") arbitral award concerning a payment deadline under a ship sale agreement based on the SALEFORM 2012. The Court held that a broad definition of "Banking Days"
spanning multiple global time zones does not extend the deadline for payment to the latest possible time zone. Instead, once the relevant Banking Day has been identified, the deadline is ordinarily determined by reference to the local time in the jurisdiction where the payment obligation is to be performed.

Brief Facts
The dispute arose out of a contract for the sale of the MT Songa Coral (the "MOA").

Under the MOA, the balance of the purchase price was to be pre-positioned in an escrow account and released from the escrow account to the Sellers' Account on delivery of the ship "but not later than three (3) Banking Days after the date that Notice of Readiness has been given". The MOA contained a broad definition of "Banking Days," defining the term as days on which banks were open in multiple jurisdictions across various time zones, including the US, Canada, the UK, Switzerland, Turkey, the
UAE, Greece, and Norway. The relevant currency was US Dollars. The MOA provided that the
"escrow account" was an account at Nordea Bank in Norway to be operated by the escrow agent.

On 2 September 2022, the notice of readiness was given, setting a deadline of 8 September 2022 for the release of the escrow funds. The balance of the purchase price had not been released from the escrow account by midnight in Norway at the end of 8 September. At 12:09 am on 9 September

(Norway time), the Sellers exercised their right to cancel the contract. However, at that time, it was still 8 September in the UK, Canada and the US.

The LMAA arbitral tribunal held that the Buyers had until midnight on 8 September 2022 in the most westerly of the jurisdictions listed in the Banking Days definition (i.e. until midnight Hawaii-Aleutian
Standard Time) before being in breach for failing to comply with their payment obligations under clause 3 of the MOA. The Sellers appealed the LMAA award under section 69 of the Arbitration Act 1996.

Key Issues

The question before the English Commercial Court was whether the Buyers were obligated to ensure the release of the funds from the escrow account before midnight at the end of 8 September in
Norway.

The Buyers argued that because the definition of "Banking Days" included locations across the globe, the payment deadline should not expire until midnight in the most westerly time zone specified in the contract (Hawaii).

Decision of the Court

The Court allowed the appeal and ruled in favour of the Sellers. The Court provided the following reasoning:

1.
Purpose of the Definition: The multi-jurisdictional definition of "Banking Days" was intended solely to determine which calendar days counted towards the three-day period (i.e., to exclude weekends and local bank holidays in those specific countries). It was not intended to redefine the physical length of a "day".

2.
Absurdity and Uncertainty: Accepting the Buyers' interpretation would mean a single "day"
lasted 37 to 38 hours (from midnight in the most easterly territory, the UAE, to the following midnight in the most westerly, Hawaii). Furthermore, it would create overlapping "days" as the 9th of September would begin before the 8th of September had ended. The Court noted that this interpretation "is not likely to produce certainty in general".

3.
Place of Performance: The Court applied the well-established principle that time is measured by reference to the place where the contractual obligation falls to be performed. Since the obligation was to release the funds to the Sellers in Norway, the deadline was midnight in
Norway.

Practical Takeaways
This decision provides crucial clarity for shipowners, buyers, and financiers involved in cross-border ship sale and purchase (S&P) transactions, as well as broader international trade and finance contracts.

1.
Time Zones Matter: A definition of "Banking Days" that spans multiple time zones does not give a paying party the entire globe's worth of daylight hours to make a payment.

2.
Identify the Place of Performance: Parties must look to the specific place where the act (e.g., payment, delivery of documents) is required to be performed to determine the exact time the deadline expires. In this case, because the obligation was to release the funds to the Sellers in
Norway, Norwegian midnight applied.

3.
Drafting Tip: To avoid costly disputes and the risk of wrongful cancellation, parties should explicitly state the applicable time zone for any strict contractual deadlines (e.g., "by 5:00 pm
London Time" or "by midnight Norwegian Time").

Conclusion
This decision provides important clarity on the interpretation of time-related provisions in cross-border ship sale and purchase contracts. The English Commercial Court has confirmed that where a contract defines "Banking Days" by reference to multiple jurisdictions across different time zones, that definition serves only to identify which calendar days count towards a contractual deadline. It does not create an extended "super-day" lasting until midnight in the most westerly jurisdiction. Instead, once the relevant
Banking Day is identified, the deadline for performance is determined by reference to local time at the place where the contractual obligation is to be performed.

For parties to ship sale agreements and other cross-border commercial contracts, this judgment underscores the importance of clearly specifying the applicable time zone for strict payment deadlines.
Where the place of performance is identifiable (as it usually will be for payment obligations), parties should expect that local midnight at that place will mark the expiry of the deadline-regardless of how broadly the "Banking Days" definition may be drafted. As a matter of prudent practice, parties should expressly state the governing time zone for critical deadlines to avoid costly disputes and the risk of wrongful cancellation.

If you have any queries on the above, please feel free to contact our team members set out on this page. For regional Shipping & International Trade matters, please see Rajah & Tann Asia's Regional
Shipping Practice for more information.

Contacts

SHIPPING & INTERNATIONAL TRADE

V Bala
PARTNER

D +65 6232 0383
bala@rajahtann.com

Jonathan Oon
PARTNER

D +65 6232 0604
jonathan.oon@rajahtann.com

Please feel free to also contact Knowledge Management at RTApublications@rajahtann.com.

Regional Contacts
Cambodia
Rajah & Tann Sok & Heng Law Office
T  +855 23 963 112 | +855 23 963 113
kh.rajahtannasia.com
 Myanmar
Rajah & Tann Myanmar Company Limited
T  +951 9253750
mm.rajahtannasia.com

China
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP
Representative Offices
Shanghai Representative Office
T  +86 21 6120 8818
F  +86 21 6120 8820
Shenzhen Representative Office
T  +86 755 8898 0230
cn.rajahtannasia.com
 Philippines
Gatmaytan Yap Patacsil Gutierrez & Protacio
(C&G Law)
T  +632 8248 5250
www.cagatlaw.com
Singapore
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP
T  +65 6535 3600
sg.rajahtannasia.com
Indonesia
Assegaf Hamzah & Partners
Jakarta Office
T  +62 21 2555 7800
F  +62 21 2555 7899
Surabaya Office
T  +62 31 5116 4550
F  +62 31 5116 4560
www.ahp.co.id

Thailand
Rajah & Tann (Thailand) Limited
T  +66 2656 1991
th.rajahtannasia.com
Vietnam
Rajah & Tann LCT Lawyers
Ho Chi Minh City Office
T  +84 28 3821 2673 | +84 28 3521 2832
Hanoi Office
T  +84 24 3267 6127 | +84 24 3267 6128
vn.rajahtannasia.com

Lao PDR
Rajah & Tann (Laos) Co., Ltd.
T  +856 21 454 239
la.rajahtannasia.com

Malaysia
Christopher & Lee Ong
T  +603 2273 1919
F  +603 2273 8310
www.christopherleeong.com

Rajah & Tann Asia is a network of legal practices based in Asia.
Member firms are independently constituted and regulated in accordance with relevant local legal requirements. Services provided by a member firm are governed by the terms of engagement between the member firm and the client.
This Update is solely intended to provide general information and does not provide any advice or create any relationship, whether legally binding or otherwise.
Rajah & Tann Asia and its member firms do not accept, and fully disclaim, responsibility for any loss or damage which may result from accessing or relying on this Update.

Our Regional Presence

Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP is one of the largest full-service law firms in Singapore, providing high quality advice to an impressive list of clients.  We place strong emphasis on promptness, accessibility and reliability in dealing with clients. At the same time, the firm strives towards a practical yet creative approach in dealing with business and commercial problems. As the Singapore member firm of the Lex Mundi Network, we are able to offer access to excellent legal expertise in more than 100 countries.

Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP is part of Rajah & Tann Asia, a network of local law firms in Cambodia, China, Indonesia, Lao PDR, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines,
Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam. Our Asian network also includes regional desks focused on Brunei, Japan and South Asia.

The contents of this Update are owned by Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP and subject to copyright protection under the laws of Singapore and, through international treaties, other countries. No part of this Update may be reproduced, licensed, sold, published, transmitted, modified, adapted, publicly displayed, broadcast (including storage in any medium by electronic means whether or not transiently for any purpose save as permitted herein) without the prior written permission of Rajah & Tann
Singapore LLP.

Please note also that whilst the information in this Update is correct to the best of our knowledge and belief at the time of writing, it is only intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter and should not be treated as a substitute for specific professional advice for any particular course of action as such information may not suit your specific business and operational requirements. It is to your advantage to seek legal advice for your specific situation. In this regard, you may contact the lawyer you normally deal with in Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP or email Knowledge Management at RTApublications@rajahtann.com.

What's the problem? (required)

Source link (optional)

Describe the problem (and edit the text or pick an issue type) to submit.

Suggestions are submitted anonymously. No account or personal information is required or sent.