Suggest a correction

Government's Acquisition of Properties at Rochor Centre

Hansard, 2012-01-17

Match the official source exactly.

What needs fixing?

Wrong or mistyped textWrong structure or numberingWrong title or detailsDuplicated content

Proposed text

Sir, to be fair, I think not all the terms of the forced acquisition and the relocation for my residents are negative. For example, the fresh lease of 99 years versus the current 60 years. And, of course, I have been told many times that these practices have been in place for many years, and that the terms apply to other SERS projects. What I am asking Minister for is perhaps for Minister to consider a small work team that comprises some of us to represent the residents' needs, to see if some of these practices can be updated and improved. Especially in the case of, I guess, forced acquisitions where residents actually lose the choice of the time that they would prefer to sell and also the choice of their preferred dwelling. I think there is a case for studying some of these practices – which have been told to me many times – that have been in place for so long. I just ask for a work team to do that. Some of the practices that may need to be re-considered are, for example, the valuation of the current flat –

What's the problem? (required)

Source link (optional)

Describe the problem (and edit the text or pick an issue type) to submit.

Suggestions are submitted anonymously. No account or personal information is required or sent.