Clause 17

Subject to this section, an application to the Court for an order under subsection (5) may be made by any of the persons specified in subsection (2), on one or more of the grounds specified in subsection (3).(2) For the purpose of this section, the person who can make the application is a creditor who is bound by the compromise or arrangement pursuant to the debt restructuring proposal approved under section 72M(6) or the Restructuring Adviser.(3) For the purposes of subsection (1), the grounds of application are that —

there is a material procedural irregularity at or in relation to the meeting of the company and its creditors pursuant to section 72M, or in relation to the approval of the creditors at the meeting, including a situation where —

any of the contents of the notice to summon the meeting specified in section 72M(3) is materially false or misleading;

there is a material omission in such contents; or

there is otherwise a defect in the manner in which the approval has been obtained from the creditors;

a substitution or splitting of classification of creditors is necessary in the circumstances for the compromise or arrangement to be fair and equitable to all the creditors who are meant to be bound by the compromise or arrangement; or

the proposed compromise or arrangement approved by the meeting of the company and its creditors under section 72M is contrary to the interests of the creditors of the company as a whole.(4) For the purpose of subsection (3), a failure by the company to send the notice under section 72M(2)(a) to a creditor who is bound by the compromise or arrangement because the company does not know and has no reasonable grounds to know of the creditor’s name or address, is not regarded as a material procedural irregularity unless, either —

the debt restructuring proposal would not have been approved by the requisite majority had the creditor been present at the meeting and objected to the debt restructuring proposal; or

the creditor receives an amount under the debt restructuring proposal that is lower than what the creditor is estimated to receive in the most likely scenario if the compromise or arrangement is not binding on the company and its creditors.(5) If the Court is satisfied that one or more of the grounds in subsection (3) is satisfied, the Court may make any order it thinks fit, including —

revoking or suspending the compromise or arrangement; or

giving any directions to the Restructuring Adviser, including a direction to put to the creditors for consideration any modifications to the compromise or arrangement, except that no modification may be made to any material commercial terms of the debt restructuring proposal.”.