Suggest a correction

Definitions of “relevant appeal” and “relevant proceedings” in section 36O(1) of Act

Legal Profession (Representation in Singapore International Commercial Court) Rules 2014

Match the official source exactly.

What needs fixing?

Wrong or mistyped textWrong structure or numberingWrong title or detailsDuplicated content

Proposed text

—(1) For the purposes of the definition of “relevant appeal” in section 36O(1) of the Act, a relevant appeal is any appeal to the appellate court from any judgment given or order made by the Singapore International Commercial Court in any relevant proceedings.(2) For the purposes of the definition of “relevant proceedings” in section 36O(1) of the Act, the following proceedings in the Singapore International Commercial Court are relevant proceedings:(a)[Deleted by S 696/2018 wef 01/11/2018](b)an offshore case;(c)an action —(i)which was treated pursuant to Order 3 of the Singapore International Commercial Court Rules 2021 as an offshore case, but which the Singapore International Commercial Court has decided is not, or is no longer an offshore case; and(ii)in which the Singapore International Commercial Court has allowed, under Order 3, Rule 7(4)(b) of the Singapore International Commercial Court Rules 2021, a party to continue to be represented by a registered foreign lawyer or by a solicitor registered under section 36E of the Act;(ca)any proceedings mentioned in section 18D(2)(c) of the Supreme Court of Judicature Act 1969;(d)an application under Order 25 of the Singapore International Commercial Court Rules 2021 to punish for —(i)contempt of the Singapore International Commercial Court committed in connection with any proceedings referred to in sub-paragraph (b), (c) or (ca); or(ii)contempt of the appellate court committed in connection with any appeal to the appellate court from any judgment given or order made by the Singapore International Commercial Court in any proceedings referred to in sub-paragraph (b), (c) or (ca);(e)an action in respect of which the Singapore International Commercial Court or the appellate court has made —(i)an order that a question of foreign law be determined on the basis of submissions instead of proof; and(ii)an order permitting a named registered foreign lawyer, a named registered law expert, or a named solicitor registered under section 36E of the Act, to make submissions on the question of foreign law on behalf of a party.

What's the problem? (required)

Source link (optional)

Describe the problem (and edit the text or pick an issue type) to submit.

Suggestions are submitted anonymously. No account or personal information is required or sent.