Suggest a correction

Employees who may make claims

Employment Claims Regulations 2017

Match the official source exactly.

What needs fixing?

Wrong or mistyped textWrong structure or numberingWrong title or detailsDuplicated content

Proposed text

—(1) For the purposes of section 12(2)(a) of the Act, a claim relating to a specified contractual dispute may be made by an employee in relation to whom all of the following requirements are satisfied:(a)the employee works or worked under a contract of service with an employer who —(i)being an individual — resides, or carries on a business, in Singapore; or(ii)not being an individual — is incorporated or formed under any written law, or carries on a business in Singapore;(b)the employee is any of the following:(i)a citizen of Singapore;(ii)a permanent resident of Singapore;(iii)a foreigner —(A)who has or had a valid work pass entitling the foreigner to work for the employer during the period when the dispute giving rise to the claim arose;(B)who had a valid work pass entitling the foreigner to work for the employer, whose work pass was cancelled or revoked through no fault of the foreigner, and who continued to work for the employer, during the period when the dispute giving rise to the claim arose, without knowing of the cancellation or revocation of the work pass; or(C)who, under any notification under section 4 of the Employment of Foreign Manpower Act 1990, is or was entitled to work for the employer during the period when the dispute giving rise to the claim arose, without holding a valid work pass;(c)the employee is not any of the following:(i)a seafarer;(ii)a domestic worker;(iii)a public officer;(iv)an employee of a statutory body.(2) For the purposes of section 12(2)(a) of the Act, a claim relating to a specified statutory dispute concerning any matter specified in items 1 to 12 of the Second Schedule to the Act, or a claim relating to a wrongful dismissal dispute concerning any matter specified in item 3 of the Third Schedule to the Act, may be made by an employee who does not belong to any class of employees mentioned in section 13(a) of the Child Development Co‑Savings Act 2001.(3) For the purposes of section 12(2)(a) of the Act, a claim relating to a specified statutory dispute concerning any matter specified in items 13 to 42 of the Second Schedule to the Act, or a claim relating to a wrongful dismissal dispute concerning any matter specified in item 2 of the Third Schedule to the Act, may be made by an employee in relation to whom all of the following requirements are satisfied:(a)the employee works or worked under a contract of service with an employer who —(i)being an individual — resides, or carries on a business, in Singapore; or(ii)not being an individual — is incorporated or formed under any written law, or carries on a business in Singapore;(b)the employee is any of the following:(i)a citizen of Singapore;(ii)a permanent resident of Singapore;(iii)a foreigner —(A)who has or had a valid work pass entitling the foreigner to work for the employer during the period when the dispute giving rise to the claim arose;(B)who had a valid work pass entitling the foreigner to work for the employer, whose work pass was cancelled or revoked through no fault of the foreigner, and who continued to work for the employer, during the period when the dispute giving rise to the claim arose, without knowing of the cancellation or revocation of the work pass; or(C)who, under any notification under section 4 of the Employment of Foreign Manpower Act 1990, is or was entitled to work for the employer during the period when the dispute giving rise to the claim arose, without holding a valid work pass;(c)the employee is not any of the following:(i)a seafarer;(ii)a domestic worker;(iii)a person mentioned in paragraph (d) of the definition of “employee” in section 2(1) of the Employment Act 1968;(iv)a public officer.(4) For the purposes of section 12(2)(a) of the Act, a claim relating to a specified statutory dispute concerning any matter specified in item 43 of the Second Schedule to the Act may be made by an employee who is not exempted under section 11 of the Retirement and Re‑employment Act 1993 from sections 7 and 8 of that Act.(5) For the purposes of section 12(2)(a) of the Act, a claim relating to a wrongful dismissal dispute concerning any matter specified in item 1 of the Third Schedule to the Act may be made by an employee in relation to whom all of the following requirements are satisfied:(a)the employee works or worked under a contract of service with an employer who —(i)being an individual — resides, or carries on a business, in Singapore; or(ii)not being an individual — is incorporated or formed under any written law, or carries on a business in Singapore;(b)the employee is any of the following:(i)a citizen of Singapore;(ii)a permanent resident of Singapore;(iii)a foreigner —(A)who has or had a valid work pass entitling the foreigner to work for the employer during the period when the dispute giving rise to the claim arose;(B)who had a valid work pass entitling the foreigner to work for the employer, whose work pass was cancelled through no fault of the foreigner, and who continued to work for the employer, during the period when the dispute giving rise to the claim arose, without knowing of the cancellation of the work pass; or(C)who, under any notification under section 4 of the Employment of Foreign Manpower Act 1990, is or was entitled to work for the employer during the period when the dispute giving rise to the claim arose, without holding a valid work pass;(c)the employee is a relevant employee within the meaning of section 14(2A) of the Employment Act 1968;(d)the employee is not any of the following:(i)a seafarer;(ii)a domestic worker;(iii)a person mentioned in paragraph (d) of the definition of “employee” in section 2(1) of the Employment Act 1968;(iv)a public officer.(6) For the purposes of section 12(2)(b) of the Act, a claim may be made by an employee in relation to whom all of the following requirements are satisfied:(a)the employee is or was a workman;(b)the employee works or worked under a contract of service with an employer who —(i)being an individual — resides, or carries on a business, in Singapore; or(ii)not being an individual — is incorporated or formed under any written law, or carries on a business in Singapore;(c)the employee is any of the following:(i)a citizen of Singapore;(ii)a permanent resident of Singapore;(iii)a foreigner —(A)who has or had a valid work pass entitling the foreigner to work for the employer during the period when the dispute giving rise to the claim arose;(B)who had a valid work pass entitling the foreigner to work for the employer, whose work pass was cancelled or revoked through no fault of the foreigner, and who continued to work for the employer, during the period when the dispute giving rise to the claim arose, without knowing of the cancellation or revocation of the work pass; or(C)who, under any notification under section 4 of the Employment of Foreign Manpower Act 1990, is or was entitled to work for the employer during the period when the dispute giving rise to the claim arose, without holding a valid work pass;(d)the employee is neither a public officer nor an employee of a statutory board.

What's the problem? (required)

Source link (optional)

Describe the problem (and edit the text or pick an issue type) to submit.

Suggestions are submitted anonymously. No account or personal information is required or sent.