11+ results
Subsidiary Legislation MA-R2 2008
—(1) Subject to paragraph (2), a moneylender need not provide an individual who is a borrower, an agent of a borrower, a connected party of a borrower or a beneficial owner of a borrower, with access to —(a)any personal data of the individual that is in the p...
Subsidiary Legislation MA-S73-2009 2008
—(1) Subject to paragraph (2), a moneylender need not provide an individual who is a borrower, an agent of a borrower, a connected party of a borrower or a beneficial owner of a borrower, with access to —(a)any personal data of the individual that is in the p...
Bill 10 2026
To be clear, the Personal Data Protection Act 2012 and Parts 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D and 4 of the Cybersecurity Act 2018 do not apply to or in relation to the information mentioned in subsection (3).
[2025] SGHC 173
SGHC2025-08-29District Court Appeal No 28 of 2024
[101] For the reasons above, I find, contrary to the DJ’s decision, that in disclosing Mr Piper’s name and e-mail address to Ms Loi through the Prior Disclosures and the 7 September Disclosure, SKM breached ss 13 and 18(a) of the PDPA. However, I agree with t...
[2025] SGHC(A) 12
SGHC(A)2025-08-19Appellate Division / Civil Appeal No 7 of 2025
[48] For these reasons, we dismiss the appeal with costs to the Respondent fixed at $30,000 (all in). The usual consequential orders are to apply.
Bill 9 2025
In the Personal Data Protection Act 2012, in the Second Schedule, in Part 3, in Division 1, in paragraph 3, delete sub‑paragraph (a).
Bill 22 2025
In the Personal Data Protection Act 2012, in section 48C —(a)in subsection (1), before the definition of “disclose”, insert —“ “data sharing and use direction” and “further authorisation” have the meanings given by section 2(1) of the Public Sector (Governanc...
Bill 20 2025
For the purposes of subsection (1)(a), the disclosure of relevant information about an individual is not considered to be required or permitted under any written law merely because the individual has consented or has given his or her consent in accordance wit...
[2022] SGCA 60
SGCA2022-09-09Civil Appeal No 174 of 2020
[134] For all of the foregoing reasons, we allow the appeal in full and restore the orders made by the DJ on the ground that the appellant’s emotional distress is a form of “loss or damage” within the meaning of s 32(1).
[2022] SGHC 310
SGHC2022-12-09Suit No 1233 of 2020
On 20 March 2019, Razer and WSL entered into a Data Processing Addendum (“DPA”). The DPA formed part of the agreement between them and highlighted WSL’s obligations with respect to personal data made available to WSL in the course of its provision of services...