Judgment Header
Dinesh Pillai a/l K Raja Retnam v Public Prosecutor [2012] SGCA 49
Loading…
[2012] SGCA 49
Court of Appeal of Singapore29 Aug 2012Criminal Motion No 51 of 2012
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 1 later decision. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“This must be patently incorrect. Prosecutorial discretion is enshrined in Article 35(8) of the Constitution. In Dinesh Pillai a/l K Raja Retnam v Public Prosecutor [2012] SGCA 49 (“Dinesh Pillai”) at [20], the Court of Appeal stated that the Prosecution’s discretion to “prosecute for a more serious offence rather than”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Dinesh Pillai a/l K Raja Retnam v Public Prosecutor [2012] SGCA 49
Case Metadata
Case No: Criminal Motion No 51 of 2012
Case Metadata
Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2012-08-29
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.