[2014] SGCA 22

“85. The same can be gleaned from the decision of the Singapore Court in Ho Kang Peng v Scintronix Corp Ltd [2014] SGCA 22. The case concerns a claim by the corporation against its former Chief Executive Officer, who had approved payments to a Taiwanese company known as Bontech Enterprise Co Ltd. The payments were made”

“85. The same can be gleaned from the decision of the Singapore Court in Ho Kang Peng v Scintronix Corp Ltd [2014] SGCA 22. The case concerns a claim by the corporation against its former Chief Executive Officer, who had approved payments to a Taiwanese company known as Bontech Enterprise Co Ltd. The payments were made”

“85. The same can be gleaned from the decision of the Singapore Court in Ho Kang Peng v Scintronix Corp Ltd [2014] SGCA 22. The case concerns a claim by the corporation against its former Chief Executive Officer, who had approved payments to a Taiwanese company known as Bontech Enterprise Co Ltd. The payments were made”

“ated the scheme against Petrotech) cannot be attributed to Petrotech, which was in the dark as to the conspiracy against it. In Ho Kang Peng v Scintronix Corp Ltd (formerly known as TTL Holdings Ltd) [2014] SGCA 22, the Court of Appeal observed (at [70]–[71]):”