Judgment Header
Public Prosecutor v Yen May Woen [2003] SGHC 60
Court DecisionSGHC
[2003] SGHC 60
[2003] SGHC 60
General Division of the High Court of Singapore21 Mar 2003CC 2/2003
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
This decision has been doubted in a later judgment and cited in 1 other later decision. Confirm it is still good law before relying on it.
- Doubted by [2023] SGHC 95
Detected automatically from later judgments; not a substitute for a citator check.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
2Later cases and laws citing this decision
“1999] 1 SLR(R) 931 at [16]. The mere fact that questions may remain unanswered does not necessarily mean that a reasonable doubt in the Prosecution’s case has arisen: Public Prosecutor v Yen May Woen [2003] SGHC 60 at [60].”
“This was reaffirmed in a number of subsequent cases such as Satli bin Masot v Public Prosecutor [1999] 1 SLR(R) 931 (“Satli bin Masot”) at [15], and Public Prosecutor v Yen May Woen [2003] SGHC 60 at [59] (which was upheld on appeal). The fact is that the keeping of proper records will obviate the need to adduce eviden”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: CC 2/2003
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2003-03-21
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.