Judgment Header
Re Ng Huat Foundations Pte Ltd [2005] SGHC 112
Court DecisionSGHC
[2005] SGHC 112
[2005] SGHC 112
General Division of the High Court of Singapore24 Jun 2005OS 1611/2004
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 12 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
12Later cases and laws citing this decision
“ere is no realistic prospect of a scheme receiving the requisite approval, the court should not act in vain in granting the application for meetings to be convened; see Re Ng Huat Foundations Pte Ltd [2005] SGHC 112 at [9]. This is something that the applicant’s solicitors and the proposed scheme manager should take in”
“to do so if the Intervener can proof to this court that the Company had not been bona fide in its OS and/or the JM Order was given in vain as per what was envisaged in Re Ng Huat Foundations Pte Ltd [2005] SGHC 112 or The Royal Bank of Scotland NV (formerly known as ABN Amro Bank NV) and others v TT International Ltd a”
- Cited1. TOP BUILDERS CAPITAL BERHAD (Registration No. 201301043050 (1072872-D)) (WA-24NCC-608-12/2020)Case
“210(1) for the calling of a scheme meeting. This was important as, at that stage, the court had to be satisfied that it would not be futile to call the scheme meeting (Re Ng Huat Foundations Pte Ltd [2005] SGHC 112 (Re Ng Huat) at [9]; The Royal Bank of Scotland NV v TT International Ltd [2012] 2 SLR 213 at [64]). Seco”
“210(1) for the calling of a scheme meeting. This was important as, at that stage, the court had to be satisfied that it would not be futile to call the scheme meeting (Re Ng Huat Foundations Pte Ltd [2005] SGHC 112 (Re Ng Huat) at [9]; The Royal Bank of Scotland NV v TT International Ltd [2012] 2 SLR 213 at [64]). Seco”
“ere is no realistic prospect of a scheme receiving the requisite approval, the court should not act in vain in granting the application for meetings to be convened; see Re Ng Huat Foundations Pte Ltd [2005] SGHC 112 at [9]. This is something that the applicant’s solicitors and the proposed scheme manager should take in”
Show 7 moreShow fewer
- CitedSURREALIST COMMUNITIES (M) SDN BHD v 1. ) SCEC GROUP (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD (WA-28JM-20-10/2021)Case
“ere is no realistic prospect of a scheme receiving the requisite approval, the court should not act in vain in granting the application for meetings to be convened; see Re Ng Huat Foundations Pte Ltd [2005] SGHC 112 at [9]. This is something that the applicant’s solicitors and the proposed scheme manager should take in”
“ere is no realistic prospect of a scheme receiving the requisite approval, the court should not act in vain in granting the application for meetings to be convened; see Re Ng Huat Foundations Pte Ltd [2005] SGHC 112 at [9]. This is something that the applicant’s solicitors and the proposed scheme manager should take in”
“ere is no realistic prospect of a scheme receiving the requisite approval, the court should not act in vain in granting the application for meetings to be convened: see Re Ng Huat Foundations Pte Ltd [2005] SGHC 112 at [9]. This is something that the applicant’s solicitors and the proposed **Note : Serial number will b”
“210(1) for the calling of a scheme meeting. This was important as, at that stage, the court had to be satisfied that it would not be futile to call the scheme meeting (Re Ng Huat Foundations Pte Ltd [2005] SGHC 112 (Re Ng Huat) at [9]; The Royal Bank of Scotland NV v TT International Ltd [2012] 2 SLR 213 at [64]). Seco”
“s 210(1) for the calling of a scheme meeting. This was important as at that stage, the court had to be satisfied that it would not be futile to call the scheme meeting (Re Ng Huat Foundations Pte Ltd [2005] SGHC 112 (“Re Ng Huat”) at [9]; The Royal Bank of Scotland NV and others v TT International Ltd and another appea”
“(c) The court will consider if there is “no realistic prospect” of the scheme receiving the requisite approval: TT International at [64], citing with approval Re Ng Huat Foundations Pte Ltd [2005] SGHC 112 at [9]. Where the opposition is such that the required supermajorities cannot be met, there is no realistic prospe”
“However, where there was no realistic prospect of a scheme receiving the requisite approval, the court should not act in vain: see Re Ng Huat Foundations Pte Ltd [2005] SGHC 112 (“Ng Huat Foundations”) (at [9]), which was subsequently affirmed by the Court of Appeal in The Royal Bank of Scotland NV (formerly known as A”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: OS 1611/2004
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2005-06-24
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.