Judgment Header
The "Asia Star" [2009] SGHC 91
Court DecisionSGHC
[2009] SGHC 91
[2009] SGHC 91
General Division of the High Court of Singapore17 Apr 2009Adm in Rem 30/2004, RA 230/2008, 234/2008
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 2 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
2Later cases and laws citing this decision
“t would have been reasonable for the 3rd Respondent to carry out all these steps for the purposes of mitigation. As Prakash J (as she then was) pointed out in the High Court decision in The Asia Star [2009] SGHC 91 (at [65]), “mitigation principles do not require the injured party to incur extraordinary expenditure or”
“Sintalow further cited the following passage from The “Asia Star” [2009] SGHC 91 (at [65]) in support of its position:”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Adm in Rem 30/2004, RA 230/2008, 234/2008
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2009-04-17
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.