Judgment Header
Deutsche Bank AG v Chang Tse Wen and others [2010] SGHC 125
Court DecisionSGHC
[2010] SGHC 125
[2010] SGHC 125
General Division of the High Court of Singapore26 Apr 2010Suit No 731 of 2009 (Summons No 1188 of 2010)
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 2 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
2Later cases and laws citing this decision
“7] above). While Practice Directions do not have the force of substantive law (see Odex Pte Ltd v Pacific Internet Ltd [2008] 3 SLR(R) 18 at [30]; see also Deutsche Bank AG v Chang Tse Wen and others [2010] SGHC 125 at [13]), O 3 r 2(4) of the ROC 2021 states that any non-compliance with not only the ROC 2021 but also”
“Pendleton Lane P and another and another suit [2008] 4 SLR(R) 1 at [35]; Fermin Aldabe v Standard Chartered Bank [2009] SGHC 194 (“Fermin Aldabe”) at [39]; Deutsche Bank AG v Chang Tse Wen and others [2010] SGHC 125 (“Deutsche Bank”) at [28]). Thus, in Fermin Aldabe, where the documents in question were 14 e-mail messa”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit No 731 of 2009 (Summons No 1188 of 2010)
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2010-04-26
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.