Judgment Header
Public Prosecutor v AHB [2010] SGHC 138
Court DecisionSGHC
[2010] SGHC 138
[2010] SGHC 138
General Division of the High Court of Singapore5 May 2010Criminal Case No 14 of 2010
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 6 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
6Later cases and laws citing this decision
“ntly on Sivakumar, and submitted for a sentence of 11 years’ imprisonment and five strokes of the cane to be passed. In addition, the Prosecution highlighted three cases being Public Prosecutor v AHB [2010] SGHC 138, Public Prosecutor v Roslan bin Maswan (CC34/2014) and BMD v Public Prosecutor [2015] SGCA 70.”
“(g) Public Prosecutor v AHB [2010] SGHC 138 (“AHB”): The offender had previously been convicted of outraging the modesty of the victim, his biological daughter. After his release, he did not mend his ways; instead, he continued to outrage her”
“g age of the Victim (at [44]). I note that several other cases involving protracted sexual abuse in the familial context, such as Public Prosecutor v AOM [2011] 2 SLR 1057 and Public Prosecutor v AHB [2010] SGHC 138, were also listed as illustrations in this Band (at [54]). Thereafter, the second step of the framework”
“onment and 12 strokes of the cane for each offence. They cited the case of Public Prosecutor v BNN [2014] SGHC 7 (“BNN”), Public Prosecutor v AOM [2011] 2 SLR 1057 (“AOM”) and Public Prosecutor v AHB [2010] SGHC 138 (“AHB”) in support of their submission.”
“In Public Prosecutor v AHB [2010] SGHC 138 (“AHB”), the offender outraged the modesty of his biological daughter and raped her when she was 14 years of age. The victim became pregnant as a result, and gave birth to a daughter who she had to g”
Show 1 moreShow fewer
“ained that an evident lack of remorse may be found if the offender had conducted his defence in “an extravagant and unnecessary manner” (at [64(c)]). The Court of Appeal cited the example of PP v AHB [2010] SGHC 138 where the offender not only failed to take responsibility for raping his daughter, but also blamed his w”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Criminal Case No 14 of 2010
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2010-05-05
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.