Judgment Header
Sundercan Ltd and another v Salzman Anthony David [2010] SGHC 92
Loading…
[2010] SGHC 92
General Division of the High Court of Singapore23 Mar 2010Suit No 332 of 2009
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 1 later decision. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“le, an agreement to agree as to what happens at the conclusion of the Agreement (as set out in Clause 8.1) is, with respect, no agreement at all (see Sundercan Ltd and another v Salzman Anthony David [2010] SGHC 92, at [25], citing Walford v Miles [1992] 2 AC 128). It does not guide the parties as to what happens to th”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Sundercan Ltd and another v Salzman Anthony David [2010] SGHC 92
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit No 332 of 2009
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2010-03-23
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.