Judgment Header
Public Prosecutor v Tee Fook Boon Andrew [2011] SGHC 192
Court DecisionSGHC
[2011] SGHC 192
[2011] SGHC 192
General Division of the High Court of Singapore22 Aug 2011Magistrate's Appeal No 120 of 2011
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
This decision has been distinguished in a later judgment and cited in 1 other later decision. Confirm it is still good law before relying on it.
- Distinguished by [2020] SGHC 265
Detected automatically from later judgments; not a substitute for a citator check.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
2Later cases and laws citing this decision
“deed one where there a dearth of analogous precedents. The only other cases involving similarly high aggregate bribe quantum are Leng Kah Poh ([69] supra) and Public Prosecutor v Andrew Tee Fook Boon [2011] SGHC 192. However, these cases can be distinguished on the facts given the egregious conduct of the appellants in”
“r of his unlawful gains (see, eg, Public Prosecutor v Tee Fook Boon Andrew [2011] SGDC 211 at [78] (the fines imposed being subsequently affirmed on appeal in Public Prosecutor v Tee Fook Boon Andrew [2011] SGHC 192 at [38]) and Ang Seng Thor ([54] above) at [53] and [71]).”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Magistrate's Appeal No 120 of 2011
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2011-08-22
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.