Judgment Header
Public Prosecutor v Ellarry bin Puling and another [2011] SGHC 214
Loading…
[2011] SGHC 214
General Division of the High Court of Singapore26 Sept 2011Criminal Case No 40 of 2009
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 2 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“8] above), mens rea was establishing by finding that the accused intended to hit the deceased’s head (at [43(a)], [69], [81]). The same was found in Public Prosecutor v Ellarry bin Puling and another [2011] SGHC 214 at [46] to [48]. In Wang Wenfeng v Public Prosecutor [2012] 4 SLR 590 (“Wang Wenfeng”), mens rea was mad”
“ns of the term have emerged from the caselaw: (a) the specific injury that was actually inflicted on the deceased and that in fact caused his death (Public Prosecutor v Ellarry bin Puling and another [2011] SGHC 214; Chia Kee Chen); (b) an injury that is sufficiently serious that may result in an injury sufficient in t”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Public Prosecutor v Ellarry bin Puling and another [2011] SGHC 214
Case Metadata
Case No: Criminal Case No 40 of 2009
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2011-09-26
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.