Judgment Header
Ang Tin Gee v Pang Teck Guan [2011] SGHC 259
Loading…
[2011] SGHC 259
General Division of the High Court of Singapore2 Dec 2011Suit No 697 of 2010
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 3 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“g of accounts on a common basis, unlike an account of profits, is also not predicated on the allegation or establishment of a breach (see, in the context of partnerships, Ang Tin Gee v Pang Teck Guan [2011] SGHC 259 at [86]).”
“ters more than six years before the action was commenced, a beneficiary must bring an action which is within the scope of the exceptions in s 22(1) of the Limitation Act: Ang Tin Gee v Pang Teck Guan [2011] SGHC 259 at [112]–[117] per Belinda Ang J. He must also, if it is not an express trust, establish that the truste”
“ceased. Such duties include not taking the Partnership’s monies for his own personal use or, to make private profits to the exclusion of his partner (per Belinda Ang J in Ang Tin Gee v Pang Teck Guan [2011] SGHC 259 at [83] and [84].”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Ang Tin Gee v Pang Teck Guan [2011] SGHC 259
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit No 697 of 2010
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2011-12-02
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.