Judgment Header
Scintronix Corp Ltd v Ho Kang Peng and another [2011] SGHC 28
Loading…
[2011] SGHC 28
General Division of the High Court of Singapore2 Feb 2011Suit No 207 of 2009 (Registrar's Appeal No 392 of 2009)
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 3 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“In Scintronix Corp Ltd v Ho Kang Peng and another [2011] SGHC 28, the court held that in recent years the “[c]ourts in Singapore, as their counterparts in England, have been more amenable to bifurcate hearings”. I cite the relevant paragraphs as follows (at [25]–[”
“Main Judgment at [281(b)]. In this light, the choice to bifurcate the two tranches as a “mode of trial [was] pre-eminently a matter of case management”: Scintronix Corp Ltd v Ho Kang Peng and another [2011] SGHC 28 at [25]; Singapore Airlines Ltd v CSDS Aircraft Sales & Leasing Inc [2020] 5 SLR 221 at [19]. Bifurcation”
“In the subsequent High Court decision of Scintronix Corp Ltd v Ho Kang Peng and another [2011] SGHC 28 (“Scintronix”), Kan Ting Chiu J similarly had to decide whether the hearing of the plaintiff’s action against the two defendants should be bifurcated. The plaintiff’s action against the first defenda”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Scintronix Corp Ltd v Ho Kang Peng and another [2011] SGHC 28
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit No 207 of 2009 (Registrar's Appeal No 392 of 2009)
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2011-02-02
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.