Judgment Header
Yap Shirley Kathreyn v Tan Peng Quee [2011] SGHC 5
Loading…
[2011] SGHC 5
General Division of the High Court of Singapore11 Jan 2011Suit No 43 of 2010 (Registrar's Appeal No 242 of 2010) and (Summons No 804 of 2010)
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 2 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“ctrine does not strictly need to be applied due to the temporary nature of the stay which preserves the plaintiff’s right to prosecute his claim in Singapore (see Yap Shirley Kathreyn v Tan Peng Quee [2011] SGHC 5 at [7]).”
“ion that a Singapore court may grant such a limited stay in the discretionary exercise of its case management powers: see for example the High Court’s judgment in Yap Shirley Kathreyn v Tan Peng Quee [2011] SGHC 5 at [7], cited by the High Court in Ram Parshotam Mittal v Portcullis Trustnet (Singapore) Pte Ltd and othe”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Yap Shirley Kathreyn v Tan Peng Quee [2011] SGHC 5
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit No 43 of 2010 (Registrar's Appeal No 242 of 2010) and (Summons No 804 of 2010)
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2011-01-11
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.