Judgment Header
Public Prosecutor v Dinesh Pillai a/l Raja Retnam [2011] SGHC 95
Loading…
[2011] SGHC 95
General Division of the High Court of Singapore14 Apr 2010Criminal Case No 1 of 2011
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
This decision has been doubted in a later judgment. Confirm it is still good law before relying on it.
Detected automatically from later judgments; not a substitute for a citator check.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“ccuracy of their contents. That the messages emanated from the accused himself meant that little doubt could arise as to the cogency of the evidence (Public Prosecutor v Dinesh Pillai a/l Raja Retnam [2011] SGHC 95 at [13]). As to the relevance of the evidence of these messages, I have dealt with this issue at [138] ab”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Public Prosecutor v Dinesh Pillai a/l Raja Retnam [2011] SGHC 95
Case Metadata
Case No: Criminal Case No 1 of 2011
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2010-04-14
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.