Judgment Header
Tan Eck Hong v Maxz Universal Development Group Pte Limited [2012] SGHC 240
Loading…
[2012] SGHC 240
General Division of the High Court of Singapore30 Nov 2012Suit No 898 of 2008
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 2 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“(b) The onus on a party who asserts that a commercial arrangement is not to have legal effect is a heavy one (see Tan Eck Hong v Maxz Universal Development Group Pte Limited [2012] SGHC 240 at [60]).”
“ble circumstance to discredit the truth of his case (citing SC Sarkar, Sarkar Law of Evidence vol 3 (LexisNexis, 2016 Ed) (“Sarkar”) at p 2724; Tan Eck Hong v Maxz Universal Development Group Pte Ltd [2012] SGHC 240 at [37]).”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Tan Eck Hong v Maxz Universal Development Group Pte Limited [2012] SGHC 240
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit No 898 of 2008
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2012-11-30
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.