Judgment Header
Falmac Limited v Cheng Ji Lai Charlie [2013] SGHC 113
Court DecisionSGHC
[2013] SGHC 113
[2013] SGHC 113
General Division of the High Court of Singapore23 May 2013Suit No 935 of 2009
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 5 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
5Later cases and laws citing this decision
“encapsulates a director’s separate common law duty to exercise due care, skill and diligence: see Lim Weng Kee v PP [2002] 2 SLR(R) 848 (“Lim Weng Kee”) at [22] and Falmac Ltd v Cheng Ji Lai Charlie [2013] SGHC 113 at [65]. These two duties are “conceptually distinct” and are “different aspects of a 69 director's bundl”
“LING portal 53 director’s separate common law duty to exercise due care, skill and diligence: see Lim Weng Kee v PP [2002] 2 SLR(R) 848 (“Lim Weng Kee”) at [22] and Falmac Ltd v Cheng Ji Lai Charlie [2013] SGHC 113 at [65]. These two duties are “conceptually distinct” and are “different aspects of a director’s bundle o”
“LING portal 53 director’s separate common law duty to exercise due care, skill and diligence: see Lim Weng Kee v PP [2002] 2 SLR(R) 848 (“Lim Weng Kee”) at [22] and Falmac Ltd v Cheng Ji Lai Charlie [2013] SGHC 113 at [65]. These two duties are “conceptually distinct” and are “different aspects of a director’s bundle o”
“LING portal 53 director’s separate common law duty to exercise due care, skill and diligence: see Lim Weng Kee v PP [2002] 2 SLR(R) 848 (“Lim Weng Kee”) at [22] and Falmac Ltd v Cheng Ji Lai Charlie [2013] SGHC 113 at [65]. These two duties are “conceptually distinct” and are “different aspects of a director’s bundle o”
“director’s separate common law duty to exercise due care, skill and diligence: see Lim Weng Kee v Public Prosecutor [2002] 2 SLR(R) 848 (“Lim Weng Kee”) at [22] and Falmac Ltd v Cheng Ji Lai Charlie [2013] SGHC 113 at [65]. These two duties are “conceptually distinct” and are “different aspects of a director’s bundle o”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit No 935 of 2009
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2013-05-23
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.