Judgment Header
Edwin s/o Suse Nathen v Public Prosecutor [2013] SGHC 194
Court DecisionSGHC
[2013] SGHC 194
[2013] SGHC 194
General Division of the High Court of Singapore30 Sept 2013Magistrate's Appeal No 116 of 2013
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 3 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
3Later cases and laws citing this decision
“s in line with the principle that the absence of aggravating factors cannot be construed as a mitigating factor (Mohammed Ibrahim s/o Hamzah v PP [2015] 1 SLR 1081 at [41]; Edwin s/o Suse Nathen v PP [2013] SGHC 194 at [25]; PP v Chow Yee Sze [2011] 1 SLR 481 at [14]; Public Prosecutor v AOM [2011] 2 SLR 1057 at [37]).”
“chool zones, driving a heavy vehicle, or setting out to drive a substantial distance to reach a destination: Edwin Suse at [28]. In addition, in the case of Edwin s/o Suse Nathen v Public Prosecutor [2013] SGHC 194; [2013] 4 SLR 1139, the Singapore High Court echoed the following: [11] The actual level of alcohol toler”
“chool zones, driving a heavy vehicle, or setting out to drive a substantial distance to reach a destination: Edwin Suse at [28]. In addition, in the case of Edwin s/o Suse Nathen v Public Prosecutor [2013] SGHC 194; [2013] 4 SLR 1139, the Singapore High Court echoed the following: [11] The actual level of alcohol toler”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Magistrate's Appeal No 116 of 2013
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2013-09-30
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.