Judgment Header
Holland Leedon Pte Ltd (in liquidation) v C & P Transport Pte Ltd [2013] SGHC 281
Court DecisionSGHC
[2013] SGHC 281
[2013] SGHC 281
General Division of the High Court of Singapore31 Dec 2013Suit No 239 of 2009
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 2 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
2Later cases and laws citing this decision
“) 804 at [15]). Although evidence at trial can overcome omissions in a party’s pleadings where the opponent is not taken by surprise (Holland Leedon Pte Ltd (in liquidation) v C & P Transport Pte Ltd [2013] SGHC 281 at [150]), it may not establish facts radically different from those pleaded that more than simply vary,”
“as often evasive. In fact, I note that this is not the first time such observations have been made of the defendant’s credibility. In Holland Leedon Pte Ltd (in liquidation) v C & P Transport Pte Ltd [2013] SGHC 281, in which the defendant had testified as a witness, Lionel Yee JC observed at [152] that the defendant “”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit No 239 of 2009
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2013-12-31
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.