[2013] SGHC 94

“t term of 13 years’ imprisonment and 18 strokes of the cane is manifestly excessive in light of the fact that Haliffie’s culpability is much lower than the offender in Public Prosecutor v Tan Jun Hui [2013] SGHC 94 (“PP v Tan Jun Hui”), who was sentenced to 14 years’ imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane.”

“In Public Prosecutor v Tan Jun Hui [2013] SGHC 94 (“Tan Jun Hui”), the accused entered the lift of a HDB block with the victim, who was returning home. He threatened her with a knife with a 13cm blade. After dragging the victim out of the lift at th”

“o commit the offence. These are Ho Wee Fah, Public Prosecutor v Huang Shiyou [2010] 1 SLR 417 (“Huang Shiyou”), Public Prosecutor v Shamsul bin Sa’at [2010] 3 SLR 900, Public Prosecutor v Tan Jun Hui [2013] SGHC 94 and Public Prosecutor v BZT [2022] SGHC 148.”

“ggravated rape. We note that this was the view taken by the court in previous decisions such as: (a) Public Prosecutor v Ho Wee Fah [1998] SGHC 128 (“Ho Wee Fah”); (b) Public Prosecutor v Tan Jun Hui [2013] SGHC 94; (c) Public Prosecutor v BZT [2022] SGHC 148; (d) Public Prosecutor v Huang Shiyou [2010] 1 SLR 417; and”