Judgment Header
Ong Wui Swoon v Ong Wui Teck and another matter [2014] SGHC 157
Court DecisionSGHC
[2014] SGHC 157
[2014] SGHC 157
General Division of the High Court of Singapore7 Aug 2014Suit No 385 of 2011 (Registrar's Appeal No 54 of 2014) and Originating Summons No 1187 of 2013 (Registrar's Appeal No 72 of 2014)
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 3 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
3Later cases and laws citing this decision
“costs were not to be taxed although Mr Ong was still liable to pay the costs of the inquiry. I fixed the quantum of costs that he had to pay for the inquiry at $400. (see Ong Wui Swoon v Ong Wui Teck [2014] SGHC 157).”
“On 19 May 2014, Woo J heard RA 54 and RA 72, and the judgment is reported at Ong Wui Swoon v Ong Wui Teck and another matter [2014] SGHC 157 (“2014 Judgment”). Woo J set aside AR Khng’s decision to allow Mr Ong an extension of time to appeal against AR Leong’s substantive decision, but upheld AR Khng’s decision that al”
“ry from costs to be taxed to fixed costs of $400. This part of the decision was in the appellant’s favour. The grounds of this decision can be found in Ong Wui Swoon v Ong Wui Teck and another matter [2014] SGHC 157 (“the 2014 GD”).”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit No 385 of 2011 (Registrar's Appeal No 54 of 2014) and Originating Summons No 1187 of 2013 (Registrar's Appeal No 72 of 2014)
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2014-08-07
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.