Judgment Header
Griffin Travel Pte Ltd v Nagender Rao Chilkuri and others [2014] SGHC 205
Court DecisionSGHC
[2014] SGHC 205
[2014] SGHC 205
General Division of the High Court of Singapore16 Oct 2014Suit No 835 of 2011
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 3 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
3Later cases and laws citing this decision
“they were members of the company’s middle management and had to obtain their superiors’ sanction for their decisions (at [29]). Similarly, in Griffin Travel Pte Ltd v Nagender Rao Chilkuri and others [2014] SGHC 205 (“Griffin Travel”), the employees in question were heads of their respective departments (one of them be”
“d not, however, be relevant to the question of Phang’s liability for breach of his fiduciary duties in asking Hooi Loo to join Healthcare. In Griffin Travel Pte Ltd v Nagender Rao Chilkuri and others [2014] SGHC 205 (“Griffin Travel”), for example, the plaintiff company sued (inter alia) its former managing director (“”
“The defendant relies on Griffin Travel Pte Ltd v Nagender Rao Chilkuri and others [2014] SGHC 205 (“Griffin Travel”) at [410] and [412] for the meaning of “dishonesty”. The court in Griffin Travel noted that the plain and ordinary meaning of dishonesty was “deceitfulness shown in someone’s charac”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit No 835 of 2011
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2014-10-16
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.