Judgment Header
ADB v ADC [2014] SGHC 76
Loading…
[2014] SGHC 76
General Division of the High Court of Singapore17 Apr 2014Divorce Transferred No 206 of 2012
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 3 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“ld have been made in favour of the Wife. The Wife is able to support herself with her own earnings in the context of a short childless marriage. The Husband relies on the recent decision of ADB v ADC [2014] SGHC 76 where Choo Han Teck J held at [10] that “[t]he idea that maintenance is an unalloyed right of a divorced”
“Before we turn to the next point, the Singapore High Court decision of ADB v ADC [2014] SGHC 76 also merits some discussion. It was a brief marriage of persons who were each capable of earning a comfortable income. Between the parties, the wife owned significantly more assets than the husband.”
“Mr Singh further submits that the DJ was correct to merely preserve the right of the Wife to apply for substantive maintenance should the need arise in the future. Finally, he cites ADB v ADC [2014] SGHC 76 at [10], where I held that “the idea that maintenance is an unalloyed right of a divorced woman is an idea borne”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
ADB v ADC [2014] SGHC 76
Case Metadata
Case No: Divorce Transferred No 206 of 2012
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2014-04-17
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.