Judgment Header
TBC v TBD [2015] SGHC 130
Loading…
[2015] SGHC 130
General Division of the High Court of Singapore13 May 2015District Court Appeal No 48 of 2013
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 2 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“ties and a substantial amount in his bank balances. His retention of these assets and his steady monthly income stream are relevant financial means and resources to take into consideration (TBC v TBD [2015] SGHC 130 at [18]).”
“in the apportionment of child maintenance between himself and the Respondent. The Appellant argues that the financial burden of child maintenance should be borne equally (ie, 50:50), citing TBC v TBD [2015] SGHC 130. However, that position has been clarified in WBU v WBT [2023] SGHCF 3 (“WBU”) at [35], where Ong JAD fo”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
TBC v TBD [2015] SGHC 130
Case Metadata
Case No: District Court Appeal No 48 of 2013
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2015-05-13
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.